[sorry for the broad CC]
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 08:05:10PM -0700, PASCHAL,DAVID (HP-Roseville,ex1)
wrote:
Is this solution OK for everybody?
I see nothing objectionable from a DFSG perspective in the language you
have proposed.
Thanks for working on this issue!
--
G. Branden Robinson
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 08:05:10PM -0700, PASCHAL,DAVID (HP-Roseville,ex1)
wrote:
please forward the LICENSE
file distributed with the OpenSSL version that Debian provides, so I can
make sure it's truly identical to what I think it is. Hopefully they
don't change the wording of their license
In fact, serious thought ought to be given to using HP's solution as an
example to others that have to deal with a similar problem. It sounds
like almost the perfect OpenSSL-GPL linking exception.
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Branden Robinson wrote:
[sorry for the broad CC]
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at
Hi. After some back-and-forth discussion with our attorney, I would like to
propose the following OpenSSL exception statement to be applied to the
HP-copyrighted portion of the hpoj code which needs this (libptal and the
libraries and applications that link to it, but not ptal-mlcd):
In
4 matches
Mail list logo
