I'm adding a CC to debian-legal, the Debian ML for legal issues.
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 09:08:30PM -0400, Chuck Hagenbuch wrote:
Quoting Gregory Colpart [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Perhaps, I should ask this in all (core|drivers) developers listed
in CREDITS file (but copyright in LICENSE file is for
On Mon, 01 May 2006, Chuck Hagenbuch wrote:
I suppose another question is, what level of contribution gives
someone enough copyright say to need to approve a license change?
Fixing a typo? A few lines of code? A whole new driver seems like
enough to me; what about tweaking CSS? I don't know
:08:30 -0400
From: Chuck Hagenbuch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gregory Colpart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Eric Rostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [sork] About license of sork modules
Quoting Gregory Colpart [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Perhaps, I should ask
-20060424/002560.html
From: Chuck Hagenbuch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [sork] About license of sork modules
To: Gregory Colpart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Eric Rostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 21:08:30 -0400
Quoting Gregory
Gregory Colpart writes:
Chuck, I forward to debian-legal list, best place for license
experts.
By the way, cc'ing a closed list when emailing an open list is poor form.
(Hopefully this will help others avoid the auto-reject message I got.)
Michael Poole
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Quoting Michael Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This probably varies slightly from country to country, but at least in
the USA, copyright is not automatically transferred like this. If the
work is done for hire, the employer is the original copyright
holder. If a written agreement assigning the
6 matches
Mail list logo
