Re: Amendment: GFDL is compatible with DFSG

2006-01-24 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 11:21:34AM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote: On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 11:49:04PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: The overall subject can be software freedom but not necesarily in all cases and certainly not in the case with the man-page. One can not use simple

Re: Amendment: GFDL is compatible with DFSG

2006-01-24 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 12:17:24PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: Well, if you ask the people that use this man-page they will tell. Uh. You'll have to make a choice here: either the text is the entirety of _all_ manpages (in which case you can split off the invariant sections and the FDL

Re: Amendment: GFDL is compatible with DFSG

2006-01-24 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 12:17:24PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: With respect to that freedom GPL is also non-free. It is not. See below. Anyone arguing for invariant sections by pointing to license texts has missed all of the prior discussions on this topic, going back years. Given the