This is David Coffin's proposed license text for the next version of dcraw:
No license is required to download and use dcraw.c. However,
to lawfully redistribute dcraw, you must either (a) offer, at
no extra charge, full source code* for all executable files
containing RESTRICTED
Package: dcraw
Version: 7.02-1
Severity: serious
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007, Steve King wrote:
However I would appreciate it if the assembled masses of legal
experts could confirm that they agree that this is the case.
There's actually an even more fundamental problem with dcraw.c:
/*
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007, Steve King wrote:
You'll notice that we have no permission to distribute modified
versions of dcraw.c as required by the DFSG.
I don't agree with you here. It seems to me that we do have
permission to distribute modified versions, provided source is
included.
The
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 03:45:29 -0700 Don Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007, Steve King wrote:
You'll notice that we have no permission to distribute modified
versions of dcraw.c as required by the DFSG.
I don't agree with you here. It seems to me that we do have
permission to
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 03:45:29AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007, Steve King wrote:
You'll notice that we have no permission to distribute modified
versions of dcraw.c as required by the DFSG.
I don't agree with you here. It seems to me that we do have
permission to
Package: dcraw
Version: 7.02-1
Severity: serious
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007, Steve King wrote:
However I would appreciate it if the assembled masses of legal
experts could confirm that they agree that this is the case.
There's actually an even more fundamental problem with dcraw.c:
/*
dcraw.c --
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007, Steve King wrote:
The license against which you have raised a bug is not the one that covers
the version that is currently part of debian. The appropriate license is
here:
Right, but the issues present in the current version of the license
are also present in the
7 matches
Mail list logo
