Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency

2021-03-28 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 1:12 AM Carlos Henrique Lima Melara wrote: > He (Alec) is the creator and main contributor to devtodo, occasionally he > had help from other as noted in the AUTHORS files, though no copyright > statements were added by these occasional contributors. For this license >

Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency

2021-03-28 Thread Carlos Henrique Lima Melara
Hi, debian-legal. I'd like to ask for your help again in this matter. On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 06:45:14PM -0300, Carlos Henrique Lima Melara wrote: > I'm the new maintainer of devtodo and would appreciate an assistance of the > debian-legal on the license matter. As noted, devtodo is licensed

Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency

2021-01-08 Thread Francesco Poli
On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 18:45:14 -0300 Carlos Henrique Lima Melara wrote: > Hi, folks. Hello Carlos. > > I'm the new maintainer of devtodo and would appreciate an assistance of the > debian-legal on the license matter. As noted, devtodo is licensed under > GPL-2 only, although there is no

Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency

2021-01-08 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 06:45:14PM -0300, Carlos Henrique Lima Melara wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > Hi, folks. > > I'm the new maintainer of devtodo and would appreciate an assistance of the > debian-legal on the license matter. As noted, devtodo is licensed under > GPL-2 only,

Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency

2021-01-07 Thread Carlos Henrique Lima Melara
Control: tags -1 + confirmed Hi, folks. I'm the new maintainer of devtodo and would appreciate an assistance of the debian-legal on the license matter. As noted, devtodo is licensed under GPL-2 only, although there is no boilerplate copyright on the source files. Taking this into consideration,