Paul Wise writes ("Re: Can a license be "DFSG approved"?"):
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:53 PM, David Seaward wrote:
> > I was also reminded of the comment below, and wondered in retrospect if
> > a flagging licenses as "DFSG approved" actually make
Hi Paul,
On Fri, 2017-10-27 at 14:50 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> The DFSG is not a body that can approve things. You could say "DFSG
> compatible", or "foo version X under license Y was approved by the
> Debian ftp-masters".
Thanks for the clarification. Your comment about compatibility matches
a
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:53 PM, David Seaward wrote:
> I suggested DFSG flagging, and SPDX are interested in a machine-
> readable status list. [2] Is there such a thing?
There is not such a thing.
> I was also reminded of the comment below, and wondered in retrospect if
> a flagging licenses
Hi,
I noticed that SPDX [1] are in the process of flagging licenses as "FSF
libre" and "OSI approved". Ideally, other third parties will also be
able to flag licenses or provide APIs that do the same.
I suggested DFSG flagging, and SPDX are interested in a machine-
readable status list. [2] Is
4 matches
Mail list logo
