On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 03:52:15PM -0400, Chloe Hoffman wrote:
Also, note that at least Australia and England extend copyright protection
to industrious collections (i.e., 'sweat of the brow' databases such as
white pages).
Has anyone bothered to copyright large prime numbers discovered by
* Matthew Palmer:
Wrong for Germany. Our analogue of copyright law does cover
databases.
Mechanical compilations, as well as those requiring creative effort?
Mechanical compilations as well. Of course, most of our codified
moral rights don't apply to them. 8-)
/disp.pl/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2002/112.html?query=%7e+desktop+marketing)
in England - see many English cases cited in Desktop Marketing
From: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Legal debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Copyright on 'non-creative' data?
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 05:35:12
tom wrote:
In UE we have a directive on database, and it says that there's not
copyright on database but there's a new IP right called sui generis. The
difference is that it covers less rights than copyright (remember in the
european version e.g. droit d'auter) and for less time.
The EU
* Jacobo Tarrio:
O Domingo, 4 de Xullo de 2004 ás 20:54:48 +0100, Andrew Suffield escribía:
They may be covered by database property laws in some jurisdictions.
... which are not Copyright or Intellectual Property laws [...]
Wrong for Germany. Our analogue of copyright law does cover
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 05:35:12AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Jacobo Tarrio:
O Domingo, 4 de Xullo de 2004 ?s 20:54:48 +0100, Andrew Suffield escrib?a:
They may be covered by database property laws in some jurisdictions.
... which are not Copyright or Intellectual Property laws
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ok, more digging around for a useful emulation related program that's
unencumbered by non-free crap. I think I found one called ucon64[0],
self-billed as the 'Swiss Army Knife of emulation utilities'. I've actually
been using it for a while and for
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 01:42:22PM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
running ucon64 over said directories). Are they still covered by copyright
law in that case?
Thoughts?
Debian itself doesn't include copyright licenses in all its
directory listings and package lists -- including those with
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 01:42:22PM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
However, on the
same site, they have several zip files that are basically rom databases
produced by running the program on directories full of ROMs, allowing you to
match ROM images by their checksums. I'd like to package those
Benjamin Cutler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Anyway... the program itself is GPL, no problems there. However, on the
same site, they have several zip files that are basically rom databases
produced by running the program on directories full of ROMs, allowing you to
match ROM images by their checksums.
O Domingo, 4 de Xullo de 2004 ás 20:54:48 +0100, Andrew Suffield escribía:
They may be covered by database property laws in some jurisdictions.
... which are not Copyright or Intellectual Property laws, so Debian
would treat them in the same way it treats, for example, patents or
trademarks.
--- Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 01:42:22PM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
However, on the
same site, they have several zip files that are basically rom databases
produced by running the program on directories full of ROMs, allowing you to
match ROM images
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 10:26:00PM +0200, Jacobo Tarrio wrote:
O Domingo, 4 de Xullo de 2004 ás 20:54:48 +0100, Andrew Suffield escribía:
They may be covered by database property laws in some jurisdictions.
... which are not Copyright or Intellectual Property laws, so Debian
would treat
13 matches
Mail list logo
