Am 2007-03-24 23:08:31, schrieb Vsevolod Krishchenko:
On Saturday 24 March 2007 22:53, you wrote:
find /usr/share/doc -name copyright|xargs tar czf I_Love_Russia.tar.gz
That gives the Russian authorities something to read. :)
Sad point is it must be translated (at least unofficial
* Steve Langasek:
Yes, it's a pity that the Russian authorities should misunderstand the
nature of software licensing to such a degree.
Copyrighted works redistributable under permissive licenses are a
tough problem for law enforcement world-wide, not just Russian
authorities. 8-(
On Sunday 25 March 2007 04:37, Ben Finney wrote:
EULA must say yes, Debian really consists only of such software
which not restrict any party from using, selling or giving away the
software etc etc
There is no warranty on anything in Debian, because Debian is licensed
freely to all
On Monday 26 March 2007 22:20, Florian Weimer wrote:
Copyrighted works redistributable under permissive licenses are a
tough problem for law enforcement world-wide, not just Russian
authorities. 8-(
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/technology
/article733264.ece
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Copyrighted works redistributable under permissive licenses are a
tough problem for law enforcement world-wide, not just Russian
authorities. 8-(
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/technology/article733264.ece
Hi everybody,
I fear that it is sound stupid but I wonder does such thing like Debian
EULA exit? FC, for example, has EULA
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/Licenses/EULA)
The reason I asked this question is authorities here in Russia may require
license agreement to entire system used
On Sat, 2007-03-24 at 22:27 +0300, Vsevolod Krishchenko wrote:
Hi everybody,
I fear that it is sound stupid
Not to me. :)
but I wonder does such thing like Debian
EULA exit? FC, for example, has EULA
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/Licenses/EULA)
I have not yet seen such EULA
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Vsevolod Krishchenko wrote:
I fear that it is sound stupid but I wonder does such thing like Debian
EULA exit? FC, for example, has EULA
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/Licenses/EULA)
The reason I asked this question is authorities here in Russia may
require
On Saturday 24 March 2007 22:55, Don Armstrong wrote:
Surely this only applies to people who are selling stuff rather than
giving it away?
It applies to people that use debian in business/education/etc. :(
As far as an overall license, there isn't one, but we try to make sure
that works
On Saturday 24 March 2007 22:53, you wrote:
find /usr/share/doc -name copyright|xargs tar czf I_Love_Russia.tar.gz
That gives the Russian authorities something to read. :)
Sad point is it must be translated (at least unofficial translation) into
Russian! :(
--
Vsevolod
--
To
Hi Vsevolod!
You wrote:
I fear that it is sound stupid but I wonder does such thing like Debian
EULA exit? FC, for example, has EULA
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/Licenses/EULA)
Well, in a sense the Debian Free Software Guidelines [1] are a Debian
EULA.
[1]
Hi Bas.
You wrote:
I fear that it is sound stupid but I wonder does such thing like Debian
EULA exit? FC, for example, has EULA
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/Licenses/EULA)
Well, in a sense the Debian Free Software Guidelines [1] are a Debian
EULA.
It is close, but still it
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 11:07:26PM +0300, Vsevolod Krishchenko wrote:
On Saturday 24 March 2007 22:55, Don Armstrong wrote:
Surely this only applies to people who are selling stuff rather than
giving it away?
It applies to people that use debian in business/education/etc. :(
As far as
On Sunday 25 March 2007 00:21, Steve Langasek wrote:
There is no EULA for Debian because an EULA is a license which *restricts*
what the user is allowed to do with his own copy of the software. We place
no restrictions on the use of the software and require that our upstreams
don't do so
Vsevolod Krishchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday 25 March 2007 00:21, Steve Langasek wrote:
There is no EULA for Debian because an EULA is a license which
*restricts* what the user is allowed to do with his own copy of
the software. We place no restrictions on the use of the
Vsevolod Krishchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[DFSG] is close, but still it is just guideline for software.
Which all works in Debian must conform to, or be under threat of
removal from the project for having a release-critical bug.
EULA must say yes, Debian really consists only of such
16 matches
Mail list logo
