Scripsit John Galt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
True enough, but what if they were legally binding electronic signatures?
Let someone try to attach a signature where it wasn't supposed to be and
watch them go to jail PDQ
No, the point about electronic signatures is that the only one who
*can*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 05:51:23PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
Wouldn't the endorsements issue be best resolved by licensing the
endorsements separately from the rest of the document?
Names are not
Wouldn't the endorsements issue be best resolved by licensing the
endorsements separately from the rest of the document? i.e. the core
content could be under the DFCL (unambiguously free GPL compatible)
while endorsements, odes to pets, etc. would be under a separate
license of the original
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 05:51:23PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
Wouldn't the endorsements issue be best resolved by licensing the
endorsements separately from the rest of the document?
Names are not subject to copyright protection, and not everyone has the
money or inclination to trademark his
4 matches
Mail list logo
