On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:19:54PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
I just discovered that some of the copyright statements in xfree86's
copyright file have clauses that we usually consider non-free.
[...]
(from the GLX PUBLIC LICENSE, and as far as I can eyeball also repeated
verbatim in the CID
Scripsit Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please file a bug report against the xfree86 package and include a
reference to this thread's URL on lists.debian.org.
OK, done. Bug #211675.
Thanks for bringing this to my attention, Henning.
Hm, I don't know... Further investigation reveals
On Tuesday, Sep 16, 2003, at 16:19 US/Eastern, Henning Makholm wrote:
7. Compliance with Laws; Non-Infringement. Recipient shall comply with
all
applicable laws and regulations in connection with use and
distribution of
the Subject Software, including but not limited to, all export and
Scripsit Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
8. Claims of Infringement. If Recipient at any time has knowledge of
any one or more third party claims that reproduction,
modification, use, distribution, import or sale of Subject
Software (including particular functionality or code
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 11:55:23AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:19:54PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
7. Compliance with Laws; Non-Infringement. Recipient shall comply with all
applicable laws and regulations in connection with use and distribution of
the
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 15:17, Henning Makholm wrote:
Doable, perhaps. Free, no.
Quite.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:19:54PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
I just discovered that some of the copyright statements in xfree86's
copyright file have clauses that we usually consider non-free.
Normally I'd just file a bug, but given that the maintainer of xfree86
is commonly known to know
Branden Robinson said:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:19:54PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
I'd appreciate a re-analysis of the following. As an interested party
I will sit it out if I can, and act upon the consensus of the
participants in the discussion.
Here's my analysis. IANADD, IANAL. I
I just discovered that some of the copyright statements in xfree86's
copyright file have clauses that we usually consider non-free.
Normally I'd just file a bug, but given that the maintainer of
xfree86 is commonly known to know what he's doing, I'll ask here
in advance: What is it that I am
9 matches
Mail list logo
