On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:25:03 +1100 Matthew Palmer wrote:
My opinion of FSF people is descending rapidly here.
Dropping down, down, down... :-(
Revising history is never a good sign.
Agreed fully.
_1984_ by George Orwell comes to mind (where the Minitrue continuously
rewrites history).
--
Hello Francesco Poli, hello list,
I should clarify things here...
You wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:25:03 +1100 Matthew Palmer wrote:
My opinion of FSF people is descending rapidly here.
Dropping down, down, down... :-(
Don't think of all people in the FSF. Thanks.
Revising history is
Hey Gymnasist, be advised that if Wallace
http://www.terekhov.de/Wallace_v_Red_Hat_2nd_ANSWER.pdf
won't succeed in US, I'll invite him to Germany.
http://www.allenovery.com/asp/pdf/gercomplaw.pdf
--
Rules on distribution
Basics
Vertical relationships between market participants operating
Hello.
Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 10:14:59PM +0100, Sebastian Wieseler wrote:
So you should respect me and don't post the caches of my sites anywhere.
Admitting an error (or a misunderstanding, a misspeaking, or a good old
brain fart) is something people can respect;
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 11:26:17PM +0100, Sebastian Wieseler wrote:
So you should respect me and don't post the caches of my sites anywhere.
MY blog and I can post what I want to post. I don't care about your opinion.
Very well, but respect me and I don't care what you think seem at odds. :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, it seems this was a bit premature. The Savannah admin who was
looking at my project registration wrote to me:
I think it was useful to post here (all times UTC):
Wed 19:05 kickino decides that GPL-only is not allowed
Wed 21:40 driconf application is cancelled
Thu
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Patrick Herzig wrote:
FYI, Here's the full text:
[...]
http://64.233.179.104/search?q=cache:aaX81KBybOIJ:blog.kickino.org/+gfdl+compatible+license+savannahhl=engl=usct=clnkcd=2
is the google cache,
http://rzlab.ucr.edu/debian/savannah_gnu_org_policy.html is a mirror
of it
Hmm, it seems this was a bit premature. The Savannah admin who was
looking at my project registration wrote to me:
quote
The decision about the licenses of the project documentations was a bit
prematurate and concerned discussions are in progress.
So nothing has changed until now. If you are
Hi,
I was trying to get my project DRIconf hosted at Savannah (Non-GNU) and
found out that as of recently Savannah requires all new projects to
license their documentation under the GFDL, which we all know, Debian
considers non-free. Dual-licensing under GFDL and GPL is apparently
still ok. See
Felix Kühling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I was trying to get my project DRIconf hosted at Savannah (Non-GNU) and
found out that as of recently Savannah requires all new projects to
license their documentation under the GFDL, which we all know, Debian
considers non-free. Dual-licensing
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 12:04:22PM -0500, Felix Kühling wrote:
I was trying to get my project DRIconf hosted at Savannah (Non-GNU) and
found out that as of recently Savannah requires all new projects to
license their documentation under the GFDL, which we all know, Debian
considers non-free.
On 2006-02-09, Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What really got me saying whoa! though is the blog post linked from the
ticket comments -- the fourth paragraph seems to say that Savannah changed
it's policy because Debian doesn't think the GFDL is DFSG-free. Worrying,
if true.
The
Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2006-02-09, Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What really got me saying whoa! though is the blog post linked from the
ticket comments -- the fourth paragraph seems to say that Savannah changed
it's policy because Debian doesn't think the GFDL is
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:43:42PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2006-02-09, Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What really got me saying whoa! though is the blog post linked from the
ticket comments -- the fourth paragraph seems to say that Savannah changed
it's policy because Debian
FYI, Here's the full text:
Tue Jan 31 23:13:51 CET 2006
Savannah.GNU.org switched its policy
Today Savannah.GNU.org switched its policy about the licenses of the
hosted projects.
Since today every project must release its documentation under the GNU
Free Documentation License or any other
15 matches
Mail list logo
