Re: Freeradius and Debian

2002-11-24 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously ninewands wrote: Just a thought ... how difficult would it be to port the postgres ssl support to link to OpenSSL? Perhaps you mean GnuTLS? I'm not sure if we want to do that for stability reasons.. I GnuTLS is already stable enough for production use. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman

Re: Freeradius and Debian

2002-11-23 Thread Chad Miller
[new cc: debian-legal, Wichert Akkerman] Hi, Paul. On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 06:47:28PM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote: Will FreeRadius be appearing the the Debian Archive at all? I thought an old version used to be there, but I can't seem to see it now. I hope it will. The Sarge release manager

Re: Freeradius and Debian

2002-11-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 01:57:17PM -0500, Chad Miller wrote: However, _now_ there might be some possible legal problems with it. The postgresql driver links against libssl, which has a license that forbids linking against GPL'd code. I'm CCing debian-legal list to get opinions on whether

Re: Freeradius and Debian

2002-11-23 Thread Sam Hartman
Steve == Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Steve On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 01:57:17PM -0500, Chad Miller Steve wrote: However, _now_ there might be some possible legal problems with it. The postgresql driver links against libssl, which has a license that forbids

Re: Freeradius and Debian

2002-11-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 03:34:02PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote: I'm not sure this is true for the Postgres libraries, because the postgres libraries can function fine without ssl support and no ssl code is linked into your application. Basically the library linking argument is a functionality

Re: Freeradius and Debian

2002-11-23 Thread ninewands
On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 15:14, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 03:34:02PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote: I'm not sure this is true for the Postgres libraries, because the postgres libraries can function fine without ssl support and no ssl code is linked into your application.

Re: Freeradius and Debian

2002-11-23 Thread Walter Landry
Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not presenting a coherent enough argument to convince debian-legal I'm right; I'm too lazy to do so and it would involve significant research on my part. Instead I'm trying to convince interested parties that the fact that there exists a library that

Re: Freeradius and Debian

2002-11-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 03:07:15PM -0800, Walter Landry wrote: Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not presenting a coherent enough argument to convince debian-legal I'm right; I'm too lazy to do so and it would involve significant research on my part. Instead I'm trying to convince

Re: Freeradius and Debian

2002-11-23 Thread Walter Landry
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 03:07:15PM -0800, Walter Landry wrote: Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not presenting a coherent enough argument to convince debian-legal I'm right; I'm too lazy to do so and it would involve significant research