icense.html>
[considered]: <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#ZLib>
As previously said, I am more worried about other clauses of this
French gov open license.
Finally, please note that this is yet another license that adds to the
license proliferation problem.
Why, oh
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 11:16:48 +1100 Ben Finney wrote:
[...]
> I think we agree; I'm not sure why you think it's disingenuous, but I'm
> attempting to avoid the common situation where we are asked to judge a
> license text divorced from the work and without seeing the grant of
> license. Those are
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
> Ben Finney writes ("Re: French gov open license"):
> > More precisely, “pass DFSG” is not something we can ask of licenses.
> > Rather, the DFSG are for evaluating a *work* proposed for entry to
> > Debia
Ben Finney writes ("Re: French gov open license"):
> More precisely, “pass DFSG” is not something we can ask of licenses.
> Rather, the DFSG are for evaluating a *work* proposed for entry to
> Debian.
>
> Until we have a work to examine, with a grant of license fro
Jérémy Lal writes:
> I don't think there is such a thing named "recognized by DFSG".
I agree.
> A license can pass DFSG or not, and this one, after reading it,
> seems to be okay.
More precisely, “pass DFSG” is not something we can ask of licenses.
Rather, the DFSG are for
Hi Xavier,
I don't think there is such a thing named "recognized by DFSG".
A license can pass DFSG or not, and this one, after reading it,
seems to be okay.
Hopefully more experimented eyes will read it too.
IANAL,
Jérémy (x97).
2017-11-21 18:35 GMT+01:00 Xavier
Hi all,
French government uses now lo/ol license to publish its open datas:
https://www.etalab.gouv.fr/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Open_Licence.pdf
"To facilitate the re-use of the « Information », this licence has been
designed to be compatible with any licence which requires at least the
7 matches
Mail list logo