On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:53:56 +1100 Andrew Donnellan wrote:
I think that KPovModeler was developed with the intention that you
have POV-Ray installed. It will work fine without it, but it can only
save KPMs and POV files, and at the moment there is no other software
that can read it.
Probably
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 10:41:26AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:53:56 +1100 Andrew Donnellan wrote:
I think that KPovModeler was developed with the intention that you
have POV-Ray installed. It will work fine without it, but it can only
save KPMs and POV files, and
Francesco Poli wrote:
Or otherwise, povray upstream authors could be persuaded to relicense in
a DFSG-free manner, so that we would *gain* one new interesting package
for main, rather than *losing* one (that was wrongly placed in main).
;-)
povray upstream actually *wants* to change the
El Jueves, 19 de Enero de 2006 5:31, Francesco Poli escribió:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:32:48 +0100 Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
I think it should be moved to contrib and ...
...graphics should be rerendered
from its actual source at build time.
I think that's exagerated. That's just a waste of time
Andy Teijelo Pérez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think that's exagerated. That's just a waste of time and
resources. What else should be done at build time, make all KDE
artists repaint and re-photograph all KDE wallpapers? I don't think
art can always be treated the same way software is
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:17:38 -0800 Josh Triplett wrote:
Francesco Poli wrote:
Or otherwise, povray upstream authors could be persuaded to
relicense in a DFSG-free manner, so that we would *gain* one new
interesting package for main, rather than *losing* one (that was
wrongly placed in
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 18:55:59 + Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 10:41:26AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
Or otherwise, povray upstream authors could be persuaded to
relicense in a DFSG-free manner, so that we would *gain* one new
interesting package for main,
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 23:20:53 -0800 Josh Triplett wrote:
Andrew Donnellan wrote:
Umm, Kpovmodeler isn't a renderer, it's a modelling program that
calls POVRay to actually render it. So KPovModeler should be in
contrib.
Hmmm. The description certainly didn't give that indication, nor did
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 00:31 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
I hope some volunteers to install it and check, so that a serious bug
can be filed against kpovmodeler, if necessary...
Since I used to play with povray before becoming involved with debian.
I've just installed kpovmodeler 3.5.0-3, and
I think that KPovModeler was developed with the intention that you
have POV-Ray installed. It will work fine without it, but it can only
save KPMs and POV files, and at the moment there is no other software
that can read it.
andrew
On 1/21/06, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat,
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This was going to be delayed until a proper trademark policy was in place.
-legal came up with a pretty solid plan for what we wanted for a trademark
policy; we wanted some review by a lawyer with some knowledge of trademark
law. We haven't heard back
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:32:48 +0100 Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
[...]
* Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au [2006-01-18 11:01]:
There are currently two proposals in discussion on debian-vote
regarding a position statement on the GNU Free Documentation
License. The texts are available at
Francesco Poli wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:32:48 +0100 Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
* Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au [2006-01-18 11:01]:
As an example I want to question if I would have to move xblast* to
contrib, because the graphics are rendered with povray, or if there is
no need for it?
Umm, Kpovmodeler isn't a renderer, it's a modelling program that calls
POVRay to actually render it. So KPovModeler should be in contrib.
Andrew
On 1/20/06, Josh Triplett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Francesco Poli wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:32:48 +0100 Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
* Anthony Towns
Andrew Donnellan wrote:
Umm, Kpovmodeler isn't a renderer, it's a modelling program that calls
POVRay to actually render it. So KPovModeler should be in contrib.
Hmmm. The description certainly didn't give that indication, nor did
the fact that povray was only in Suggests.
If it has no
You might consider putting a line of blank space between quotes and
your reply, like everyone else does; it makes it easier to read.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:47:08PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
I can understand that the source for those things might be tricky,
but often images are
16 matches
Mail list logo
