Hi, all.
I am newbie and begin undestand debian community only now. Excuse me
for previous questions.
The matter looked simle. Exists several documentation of standarts in
format plain/text with license like Permission is granted to distribute
verbatim copies. Documents are useful and some
Olleg Samoylov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DFSG primary was developed for software and not adequate to text
documents, which not needed to be builded.
That's wrong, Bruce Perens intended the DFSG to apply to software and
documentation alike when he designed them. See his clarification here:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:44:04PM +0400, Olleg Samoylov wrote:
DFSG primary was developed for software and not adequate to text
documents, which not needed to be builded.
The DFSG was developed to be a standard of freedom. It's just as
applicable to documentation as it is for programs (and
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:44:04PM +0400, Olleg Samoylov wrote:
But. You must undestand and keep in mind. For normal people (not
specialized in freedom) things, such as putting gnu-standarts to
non-free, always looked very strange (said softly).
Keep in mind that normal people can install
4 matches
Mail list logo
