Il 16/04/2018 21:46, Francesco Poli ha scritto:
> I remember that this has been discussed in the past, although I cannot
> find the mailing list thread(s) right now.
> Anyway, I recall that the outcome of the discussion was the one
> described by Simon.
Ok, thanks everybody for the info.
On 04/16/2018 08:50 AM, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> "Changing is not allowed" is in conflict with DFSG #3. Has this thing ever
> been discussed?
I am not a lawyer. This is not legal advice. It is nothing more than my
understanding, which might be wrong. Furthermore, the same basic legal
theory
On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 12:13:29 +0100 Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 at 10:50:04 +0200, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> > this question might be trivial, but I just realized that the GPL license
> > is itself licensed under a license that technically does not appear
>>>>> On Mon, 16 Apr 2018, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 at 10:50:04 +0200, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
>> this question might be trivial, but I just realized that the GPL
>> license is itself licensed under a license that technically does
>> no
On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 at 10:50:04 +0200, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> this question might be trivial, but I just realized that the GPL license
> is itself licensed under a license that technically does not appear to
> be DFSG compliant:
We make an exception for the licenses of licenses
Hello,
this question might be trivial, but I just realized that the GPL license
is itself licensed under a license that technically does not appear to
be DFSG compliant:
> $ head -n 6 /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL
> GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
