On Thu, 2002-07-04 at 16:08, C.M. Connelly wrote:
The LaTeX Project Public License
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[...]
We, the LaTeX3 Project, believe that the conditions below give you
the freedom to make and distribute modified versions of The Program
that conform with whatever
Jeff, it's not clear under your license how Debian could package a
modified version. OUr binary packaging system (and the DFSG) do not
really allow modifications to be separate from the original
particularly for compiled works. I may be missing something obvious.
Assuming that this license were
On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 12:05, Sam Hartman wrote:
Jeff, it's not clear under your license how Debian could package a
modified version. OUr binary packaging system (and the DFSG) do not
really allow modifications to be separate from the original
particularly for compiled works. I may be missing
On 13-Jul-02, 23:54 (CDT), Jeff Licquia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first thing that becomes clear is their desire that LaTeX be as
static and predictable as Microsoft Word over layout issues.
Uhh, that's a joke, right? Or have you really never used MS Word? As
someone who has had the
On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 14:53, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 13-Jul-02, 23:54 (CDT), Jeff Licquia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first thing that becomes clear is their desire that LaTeX be as
static and predictable as Microsoft Word over layout issues.
Uhh, that's a joke, right? Or have you
5 matches
Mail list logo
