On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:49:48 +0200 Simon Josefsson wrote:
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I don't know whether I'll have enough time to do it personally.
Let's do as follows: I see if I can modify the wiki page on Sunday;
you look at the wiki page on Monday and, if it's not
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
These considerations lead to the following proposed rephrasing:
| If you prefer another widely recognized free license instead, the
| following ones are also fine:
| * the 3-clause BSD license
|
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Simon, I would like to thank you for your effort in this struggle
against non-free IETF documents in Debian (main).
I really appreciate the time that you're dedicating to improving Debian
from this point of view! :)
Good job!
Thanks, that helps me
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 16:06:25 +0200 Simon Josefsson wrote:
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Good job!
Thanks, that helps me going. :)
You are welcome...
[...]
These considerations lead to the following proposed rephrasing:
| If you prefer another widely recognized free
Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Simon Josefsson wrote:
http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments
A useful thing to add to that page would be simple instructions on how
those authoring IETF documents could make them available under a
DFSG-free licence (presumably in parallel to
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:04:22 +0200 Simon Josefsson wrote:
Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Simon Josefsson wrote:
http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments
A useful thing to add to that page would be simple instructions on
how those authoring IETF documents could make them
Simon Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bug #390664 inspired me to look in source packages for IETF RFC/I-D's
too, and the situation seem to be more problematic. I've put a list
of packages in testing (as of a few days ago, my mirror is slow) that
appear to contain IETF RFC or I-D's at:
Simon Josefsson wrote:
http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments
A useful thing to add to that page would be simple instructions on how
those authoring IETF documents could make them available under a
DFSG-free licence (presumably in parallel to the IETF one) - perhaps
some sample
Bug #390664 inspired me to look in source packages for IETF RFC/I-D's
too, and the situation seem to be more problematic. I've put a list
of packages in testing (as of a few days ago, my mirror is slow) that
appear to contain IETF RFC or I-D's at:
http://josefsson.org/bcp78broken/ietf-in-src.txt
9 matches
Mail list logo
