Re: ODC-By license -- DFSG-compliant?

2013-09-21 Thread Nick Oosterhof
On Sep 20, 2013, at 3:56 AM, MJ Ray wrote: On 09/19/13 23:59, Nick Oosterhof wrote: I [NNO] also subscribed to the debian-legal list. Should we stop cc'ing? Yes please, thanks. 2.4 Relationship to Contents in the Database. [...] So I think it will nearly always need another licence to

Re: ODC-By license -- DFSG-compliant?

2013-09-20 Thread MJ Ray
On 09/19/13 23:59, Nick Oosterhof wrote: In the future this /may/ end up in BioSig [1]. But more generally we would like to share neuroimaging data (fMRI, MEEG) collected from human participants and/or phantoms, in the context of cognitive neuroscience .experiments. [1]

Re: ODC-By license -- DFSG-compliant?

2013-09-19 Thread MJ Ray
On 09/12/13 17:33, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: Do you foresee any problems with Open Data Commons Attribution License (ODC-By) v1.0 http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/ full text of which is available here http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ and cited in its entirety below in this

Re: ODC-By license -- DFSG-compliant?

2013-09-19 Thread Nick Oosterhof
Dear MJ Ray, thanks for looking into this. On Sep 19, 2013, at 1:45 PM, MJ Ray wrote: On 09/12/13 17:33, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: Do you foresee any problems with Open Data Commons Attribution License (ODC-By) v1.0 Thanks for searching before asking. What package are you considering

ODC-By license -- DFSG-compliant?

2013-09-12 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Dear IANALs, ANALs et al., Upon quick google I have not found references to it at debian.org besides open data french license being compatible with it: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/12/msg00021.html Do you foresee any problems with Open Data Commons Attribution License (ODC-By) v1.0