On Sep 20, 2013, at 3:56 AM, MJ Ray wrote:
On 09/19/13 23:59, Nick Oosterhof wrote:
I [NNO] also subscribed to the debian-legal list.
Should we stop cc'ing?
Yes please, thanks.
2.4 Relationship to Contents in the Database. [...]
So I think it will nearly always need another licence to
On 09/19/13 23:59, Nick Oosterhof wrote:
In the future this /may/ end up in BioSig [1]. But more generally we would
like to share neuroimaging data (fMRI, MEEG) collected from human
participants and/or phantoms, in the context of cognitive neuroscience
.experiments.
[1]
On 09/12/13 17:33, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Do you foresee any problems with
Open Data Commons Attribution License (ODC-By) v1.0
http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/
full text of which is available here
http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/
and cited in its entirety below in this
Dear MJ Ray,
thanks for looking into this.
On Sep 19, 2013, at 1:45 PM, MJ Ray wrote:
On 09/12/13 17:33, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Do you foresee any problems with
Open Data Commons Attribution License (ODC-By) v1.0
Thanks for searching before asking. What package are you considering
Dear IANALs, ANALs et al.,
Upon quick google I have not found references to it at debian.org
besides open data french license being compatible with it:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/12/msg00021.html
Do you foresee any problems with
Open Data Commons Attribution License (ODC-By) v1.0
5 matches
Mail list logo