On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 12:04:04PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote:
When looking at the opensource.org page, I discovered that the Vovida
Licence (http://www.vovida.org/licence.html) is considered as
OSD compliant.
However, the fourth clause tells that
4. Products derived from this software may
When looking at the opensource.org page, I discovered that the Vovida
Licence (http://www.vovida.org/licence.html) is considered as
OSD compliant.
However, the fourth clause tells that
4. Products derived from this software may not be called VOCAL, nor
may VOCAL appear in their name, without
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001, Jérôme Marant wrote:
4. Products derived from this software may not be called VOCAL, nor
may VOCAL appear in their name, without prior written
permission.
Is this compatible with the third clause of the DFSG ? It looks like a
restriction on the distribution.
jerome.marant said:
When looking at the opensource.org page, I discovered that the Vovida
Licence (http://www.vovida.org/licence.html) is considered as
OSD compliant.
However, the fourth clause tells that
4. Products derived from this software may not be called VOCAL, nor
may VOCAL
4 matches
Mail list logo