On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 02:28:40PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Ben Finney writes (Re: License for Debian Maintainer Scripts):
For free software, this forum normally recommends that the Debian
packaging copyright holders should choose to grant the same license to
the Debian packaging files
Paul Tagliamonte writes (Re: License for Debian Maintainer Scripts):
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 02:28:40PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Ben Finney writes (Re: License for Debian Maintainer Scripts):
For free software, this forum normally recommends that the Debian
packaging copyright holders
Ben Finney writes (Re: License for Debian Maintainer Scripts):
For free software, this forum normally recommends that the Debian
packaging copyright holders should choose to grant the same license to
the Debian packaging files as the general license for the upstream work.
I disagree both
Micheal Waltz mwa...@qualcomm.com writes:
Is there a license that maintainer scripts for packages fall under?
If the copyright holder in those files grants one, yes.
The copyright holders for the maintainer scripts (and all the other
Debian packaging files) are often the package maintainers.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:56:57AM -0700, Micheal Waltz wrote:
Is there a license that maintainer scripts for packages fall under? I'm
wondering about anything under /debian for a package, specifically postinst,
postrm, etc type scripts.
Check the package copyright file. It should be noted in
5 matches
Mail list logo
