Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I believe that I quoted the _license_ part of a CMap source header,
deliberately leaving out the _copyright_ and _disclaimer_ parts, ad I
considered those irrelevant for the question at hand.
I think it's probably important to have the disclaimer because some
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:22:12AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I believe that I quoted the _license_ part of a CMap source header,
deliberately leaving out the _copyright_ and _disclaimer_ parts, ad I
considered those irrelevant for the question at hand.
I think it's
Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk writes:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:22:12AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
I think it's probably important to have the disclaimer because some
licensors have tried to slip licence restrictions or liabilities into
what they labelled as disclaimers; and it's useful to know
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes:
Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk writes:
I will now go through my (or my where team-maintained) 90+
packages and make sure disclaimers are included.
I don't think the disclaimer is part of the copyright license terms,
so doesn't need to be in
Hi,
At Sun, 18 Oct 2009 19:13:09 +0200,
In addition to Francesco's mail, I'd like to ask why ghostscript is
committing the CMap files to their SVN, shouldn't they just depend
on them instead of making an embedded data copy?
We (the Debian ghostscript team) do not include CMap files,
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:53 AM, mha...@mhatta.org wrote:
Also, I know some Debian packages currently contain or use their own
copy of Cmaps. For example, poppler uses poppler-data, which contains
Cmaps. IIRC xpdf-* and dvipdfmx have some Cmaps, too. I think we
should begin a coordinated
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 19:05:44 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 04:03:53PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
Mmmmh, it seems that you didn't *fully* quote the text of the new
license...
I believe that I quoted the _license_ part of a CMap source header,
deliberately
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:32:36AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 19:05:44 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 04:03:53PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
Mmmmh, it seems that you didn't *fully* quote the text of the new
license...
I believe that I
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:28:30 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Hi,
Hi! :-)
The Ghostscript project includes some so-called CMap files contributed
by Adobe, which until recently was shipped with a non-free license
allowing only redistribution:
[...]
Consequently Ghostscript in Debian have
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
September 25 CMap files was updated in Ghostscript Subversion, with the
following license:
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, are permitted provided that the
following
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 04:03:53PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:28:30 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
September 25 CMap files was updated in Ghostscript Subversion, with
the following license:
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:24:56PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
September 25 CMap files was updated in Ghostscript Subversion, with the
following license:
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without
12 matches
Mail list logo
