* Turkey Breast:
The basic issue is that this project uses an AGPL license with
several additions, which we were given to me by the SFLC and vetted
by the FSF. They fix an issue with the AGPL which is unique to
Bitcoin (ability to distribute the source code when using a
service), add a
Francesco Poli writes (AfferoGPL for Debian packaging work? [was: Re:
libbitcoin license - AGPL with clauses added by SFLC and FSF]):
On Wed, 21 May 2014 18:06:38 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
For the record, my concern was not the AGPL (I am a fan of that too, and
will most likely use it
On Wed, 21 May 2014 18:06:38 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
[...]
For the record, my concern was not the AGPL (I am a fan of that too, and
will most likely use it for my packaging work when Debian ships it in
common-licenses).
[...]
Jonas, I hope you are not going to use the GNU AfferoGPL v3
Quoting Turkey Breast (2014-05-21 14:22:23)
I've made a Bitcoin library, and am seeking inclusion into Debian. We
(me and the mentor) are seeking guidance going forwards over a license
issue.
The basic issue is that this project uses an AGPL license with several
additions, which we were
Jonas Smedegaard writes (Re: libbitcoin license - AGPL with clauses added by
SFLC and FSF):
Quoting Turkey Breast (2014-05-21 14:22:23)
I've made a Bitcoin library, and am seeking inclusion into Debian. We
(me and the mentor) are seeking guidance going forwards over a license
issue.
...
Quoting Ian Jackson (2014-05-21 17:47:42)
Jonas Smedegaard writes (Re: libbitcoin license - AGPL with clauses added by
SFLC and FSF):
Quoting Turkey Breast (2014-05-21 14:22:23)
I've made a Bitcoin library, and am seeking inclusion into Debian. We
(me and the mentor) are seeking guidance
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 06:06:38PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I can't figure out exactly what your previous concerns were but it's
good to hear that they're resolved.
For the record, my concern was not the AGPL (I am a fan of that too, and
will most likely use it for my packaging
Quoting Paul Tagliamonte (2014-05-21 18:12:11)
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 06:06:38PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I can't figure out exactly what your previous concerns were but it's
good to hear that they're resolved.
For the record, my concern was not the AGPL (I am a fan of that too,
and
On 21/05/14 22:22, Turkey Breast wrote:
Hi,
I've made a Bitcoin library, and am seeking inclusion into Debian. We (me and
the mentor) are seeking guidance going forwards over a license issue.
The basic issue is that this project uses an AGPL license with several
additions, which we were
9 matches
Mail list logo
