Sorry for the late response; I'll avoid re-hashing points. Assume for a
moment that this 'clarification' is sensical and valid:
* o Integrates source code from
Nmap *
I think we'd generally consider that restriction free, and it would be
in line
You are right. this will render nmap undistributable by Debian.
--
br,M
On 2004-08-10 02:10:02 +0100 Glenn Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I understand it, derivative work is a specific legal term,
defined
by law, not individual licenses.
I've been told it's not in English law, which is why licences which
choose English law should either define it or find
@ 10/08/2004 15:05 : wrote Mahesh T. Pai :
Humberto Massa said on Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 11:21:56AM -0300,:
You are right. this will render nmap undistributable by Debian.
Who's right? and why?
web interface in lists.debian.org did not play nice with my work mail
server, proxy and my
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 06:32:51PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
On 2004-08-10 02:10:02 +0100 Glenn Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I understand it, derivative work is a specific legal term,
defined
by law, not individual licenses.
I've been told it's not in English law, which is why licences
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 08:07:01PM -0400, MOB JUNKY wrote:
* Note that the GPL places important restrictions on derived works,
yet *
* it does not provide a detailed definition of that term. To
avoid *
* misunderstandings, we consider an application to constitute
a *
*
6 matches
Mail list logo
