Does the GPL allow redistribution of deriviate works under
a license with a rename if certain changes are made clause?
No, it does not. However, it might be worth while for us to
make a specific exception to permit linking GMP with that code.
The benefits could be great, and the
Previously Richard Stallman wrote:
Does the GPL allow redistribution of deriviate works under
a license with a rename if certain changes are made clause?
No, it does not.
Out of curiosity, why not?
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman writes:
Previously Ben Pfaff wrote:
The TSS encryption algorithm implementation in tss.c is copyright Timo
Rinne and Cirion Oy. It is used with permission, and permission has
been given for anyone to use it for any purpose as part of ssh.
This violates the
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 11:18:03PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Ben Pfaff wrote:
The TSS encryption algorithm implementation in tss.c is copyright Timo
Rinne and Cirion Oy. It is used with permission, and permission has
been given for anyone to use it for any
Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 12:18:25AM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
Does the GPL allow redistribution of deriviate works under
a license with a rename if certain changes are made clause?
The GPL requires that you include prominent notices stating that you
Brian Ristuccia writes:
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 09:18:27PM -0600, Richard Stallman wrote:
It looks like that version of ssh really was free software.
I am surprised.
Patent issues still make it not free for most people in the US.
For less than a year, if they use RSA plus Blowfish.
Previously Ben Pfaff wrote:
The TSS encryption algorithm implementation in tss.c is copyright Timo
Rinne and Cirion Oy. It is used with permission, and permission has
been given for anyone to use it for any purpose as part of ssh.
This violates the DFSG.
Wichert.
--
Ben Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] quotes the ssh-1.2.0 license:
Any derived versions of this
software must be clearly marked as such, and if the derived work is
incompatible with the protocol description in the RFC file, it must be
called by a name other than ssh or Secure Shell.
[Note: I'm moving this to the debian-legal list.]
Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am pretty sure that SSH was never free software. Could you show me
the license on the version that they started with?
I don't know what version they started with. However, the COPYING
file
9 matches
Mail list logo
