Re: The ASP nightmare: a description (was Re: OSD DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion!)

2003-03-14 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 07:45:36PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote: If anyone had claimed such any kind of distribution in this area some years ago, I'd taken it for a good joke[1]. [...] [1] compareable to a cat /bin/clear on a Solaris of the right version. I presume this was like Solaris's

Re: The ASP nightmare: a description (was Re: OSD DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion!)

2003-03-14 Thread Michael Schultheiss
Branden Robinson wrote: On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 07:45:36PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote: If anyone had claimed such any kind of distribution in this area some years ago, I'd taken it for a good joke[1]. [...] [1] compareable to a cat /bin/clear on a Solaris of the right version. I

The ASP nightmare: a description (was Re: OSD DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion!)

2003-03-12 Thread Jeremy Hankins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: Jeremy Hankins hasn't explained well enough for me why in that future we would be unable to make the kinds of free software we have now. Ah, I wasn't aware of that. I'll see if I can flesh it out a bit for you. Imagine a world with

Re: The ASP nightmare: a description (was Re: OSD DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion!)

2003-03-12 Thread Joe Moore
Jeremy Hankins said: Imagine a world with omnipresent connectivity, and a lot of copylefted software. Someone decides that they could make the browser into a platform (remember Netscape the MS antitrust trial). So they take commonly available Free software packages and stick them behind a

Re: The ASP nightmare: a description (was Re: OSD DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion!)

2003-03-12 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Jeremy Hankins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030312 18:53]: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: So they take commonly available Free software packages and stick them behind a web interface. Gcc, tetex, emacs, etc. They lock them down so that no one can access the filesystem of the