On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, PJ Weisberg wrote:
I've seen plenty of software in Debian with a clause similar to #4,
usually phrased something like $foo is distributed in the hope that
it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied
warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/06/2011 01:26, PJ Weisberg wrote:
4. The software has been designed for research purposes only and has not
been approved for clinical use. It has not been reviewed or approved by
the
Food and Drug Administration or by any other
Hi Comrades,
We are considering packaging XNAT [1]. Its license terms [2] look like an
apache 1.1 like license with additional disclaimers (not for clinical
use), and requests. Could you please advise either those of particular concern
forbidding XNAT entering main?
Here is the full list of
Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
6. We request that you acknowledge the support of XNAT in publications
that utilize the software such as by This product includes XNAT,
developed by
Randy Buckner at Harvard University and the Neuroinformatics Research
Group at
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
4. The software has been designed for research purposes only and has not
been approved for clinical use. It has not been reviewed or approved by the
Food and Drug Administration or by any other agency. You acknowledge and
agree
that
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Ken Arromdee arrom...@rahul.net wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
4. The software has been designed for research purposes only and has not
been approved for clinical use. It has not been reviewed or approved by
the
Food and Drug
6 matches
Mail list logo
