Branden I'm opposed to us practicing Stalinistic revisionism on
Branden our list archives.
On 12 Mar 2002, Sam Hartman wrote:
Me too. However I don't think it's worth getting slapped with a
copyright lawsuit over.
Your positions are not contradictory. We can make reasonable
Mark Rafn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm almost certain we'd do so. But we'd do it in such a way as to make
the person who asked it sorry they'd ever bothered. This would begin with
putting equally-offensive information that is NOT copyrighted in place of
the alleged copyright violation.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 09:41:52PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is no notice of any confidentiality in the message(s) you
cite. Furthermore, even if there were, the Debian Project was and
is not party to any such agreements.
In
Please review the Disclaimer for Debian's Public Mailing Lists:
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/disclaimer
For your convenience, the text of this disclaimer follows:
Disclaimer for the Debian mailing lists
Our mailing lists are public forums, and our mailing list archives are public.
Branden == Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Branden --XZq0mbLCR4KNTYFe Content-Type: text/plain;
Branden charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline
Branden Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Branden Please review the Disclaimer for Debian's Public Mailing
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 04:08:25PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
I'd argue that the disclaimer only matters if the person posted the
content to the list themselves rather than have it forwarded and even
then possibly only if they knew it was a list.
I believe Thomas had an excellent explanation
Branden == Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Branden On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 04:08:25PM -0500, Sam Hartman
Branden wrote:
I'd argue that the disclaimer only matters if the person posted
the content to the list themselves rather than have it
forwarded and even
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is no notice of any confidentiality in the message(s) you
cite. Furthermore, even if there were, the Debian Project was and
is not party to any such agreements.
In the present case, the emails were sent by eemuconcept.com to a
particular
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 04:08:25PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
I'd argue that the disclaimer only matters if the person posted the
content to the list themselves rather than have it forwarded and even
then possibly only if they knew it was a list.
To whom it may concern,
It came to our attention that Debian have
published on one of their mailing lists ("debian-legal") our company's
confidential e-mail exchange.
This has been done without seeking our
consentand we urge Debian to remove the entry and the follow-ups from its
archive
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Anna wrote:
It came to our attention that Debian have published on one of their
mailing lists (debian-legal) our company's confidential e-mail
exchange.
This is incorrect terminology. Jorgen Hagg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
published a message, and used debian-legal to do so.
Anna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It came to our attention that Debian have published on one of their
mailing lists (debian-legal) our company's confidential e-mail
exchange.
I don't know which address in those messages you mean.
Are you complaining about the mention of the various email
12 matches
Mail list logo
