On 05-09-2016 06:33, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Herbert Fortes writes ("declaring a license"):
>> I am doing a QA for python-irc[0] and the tarball
>> does not have a COPYING/License file. The statement
>> is done in setpu.py file and PyPi[1] only.
>>
>> [0
Herbert Fortes writes:
> I am doing a QA for python-irc[0] and the tarball does not have a
> COPYING/License file. The statement is done in setpu.py file and
> PyPi[1] only.
You have already done the action I'd recommend: convince upstream to put
an explicit grant of license
Herbert Fortes writes ("declaring a license"):
> I am doing a QA for python-irc[0] and the tarball
> does not have a COPYING/License file. The statement
> is done in setpu.py file and PyPi[1] only.
>
> [0] - https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-irc.html
> [1] - http
'
about that (no COPYING/License file ) and a version
(12.1) which had a License file declaring one
license (LGPL) and a setpu.py file declaring the
actual license (MIT) in the same tarball.
[2] - https://github.com/jaraco/irc/issues/106
Now I have an email that explicit declares one
License to all
4 matches
Mail list logo