Re: declaring a license

2016-09-06 Thread Herbert Fortes
On 05-09-2016 06:33, Ian Jackson wrote: > Herbert Fortes writes ("declaring a license"): >> I am doing a QA for python-irc[0] and the tarball >> does not have a COPYING/License file. The statement >> is done in setpu.py file and PyPi[1] only. >> >> [0

Re: declaring a license

2016-09-05 Thread Ben Finney
Herbert Fortes writes: > I am doing a QA for python-irc[0] and the tarball does not have a > COPYING/License file. The statement is done in setpu.py file and > PyPi[1] only. You have already done the action I'd recommend: convince upstream to put an explicit grant of license

Re: declaring a license

2016-09-05 Thread Ian Jackson
Herbert Fortes writes ("declaring a license"): > I am doing a QA for python-irc[0] and the tarball > does not have a COPYING/License file. The statement > is done in setpu.py file and PyPi[1] only. > > [0] - https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-irc.html > [1] - http

declaring a license

2016-09-04 Thread Herbert Fortes
' about that (no COPYING/License file ) and a version (12.1) which had a License file declaring one license (LGPL) and a setpu.py file declaring the actual license (MIT) in the same tarball. [2] - https://github.com/jaraco/irc/issues/106 Now I have an email that explicit declares one License to all