Re: licenses with name changing clauses

2006-05-29 Thread Frank Küster
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] While we're at it, there's a different issue in teTeX and TeXLive for which I'd like to have some advice from -legal. ukhyphen.tex has now a supposedly free license, but it has a broader renaming clause: Wow,

Re: PHP license style [was: Re: licenses with name changing clauses]

2006-05-28 Thread MJ Ray
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, 26 May 2006 13:41:16 +0100 MJ Ray wrote: Wow, that's arrogant, not only reserving the package's filename (arguably acceptable to ensure integrity) but the names of many possible derivatives/competitors. Does this mean that you agree with me that

licenses with name changing clauses (was: license of cstex / cslatex)

2006-05-26 Thread Frank Küster
Thomas Esser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had done modifications of three files of that package and distributed the changed files using the original filename. The author told me that this violates his license. Actually, this only happened, because when reading his license the first time, I

Re: licenses with name changing clauses (was: license of cstex / cslatex)

2006-05-26 Thread MJ Ray
=?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] While we're at it, there's a different issue in teTeX and TeXLive for which I'd like to have some advice from -legal. ukhyphen.tex has now a supposedly free license, but it has a broader renaming clause: Wow, that's arrogant, not only reserving

PHP license style [was: Re: licenses with name changing clauses]

2006-05-26 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 26 May 2006 13:41:16 +0100 MJ Ray wrote: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] While we're at it, there's a different issue in teTeX and TeXLive for which I'd like to have some advice from -legal. ukhyphen.tex has now a supposedly free license, but it has a broader