MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
While we're at it, there's a different issue in teTeX and TeXLive for
which I'd like to have some advice from -legal. ukhyphen.tex has now a
supposedly free license, but it has a broader renaming clause:
Wow,
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 26 May 2006 13:41:16 +0100 MJ Ray wrote:
Wow, that's arrogant, not only reserving the package's filename
(arguably acceptable to ensure integrity) but the names of many
possible derivatives/competitors.
Does this mean that you agree with me that
Thomas Esser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had done modifications of three files of that package and distributed
the changed files using the original filename. The author told me that
this violates his license. Actually, this only happened, because when
reading his license the first time, I
=?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
While we're at it, there's a different issue in teTeX and TeXLive for
which I'd like to have some advice from -legal. ukhyphen.tex has now a
supposedly free license, but it has a broader renaming clause:
Wow, that's arrogant, not only reserving
On Fri, 26 May 2006 13:41:16 +0100 MJ Ray wrote:
=?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
While we're at it, there's a different issue in teTeX and TeXLive
for which I'd like to have some advice from -legal. ukhyphen.tex has
now a supposedly free license, but it has a broader
5 matches
Mail list logo