OT: Re: plain language disclaimer

2000-12-16 Thread Thomas Uwe Gruettmueller
On Fre, 15 Dez 2000, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote: PROGRAM, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, PHYSICAL LAW (INLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO OHM'S LAW, SPECIAL RELATIVITY, GENERAL RELATIVITY AND SOD'S LAW), ORDINARY LOGIC WITH OR WITHOUT That would be invalid because the theory of

plain language disclaimer

2000-12-15 Thread Paul Kienzle
Hi all, Has anyone written a plain language disclaimer? It bothers me to see such redundant language on licenses, especially when they must appear in every file. I have a package ready to be distributed with Debian as soon as I sort out the license. Is legalese really a legal necessity

Re: plain language disclaimer

2000-12-15 Thread Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Paul Kienzle [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This is clearly redundant and awkward, so how about: This program is provided as is without warranty of any kind. Use it at your own risk. Nah, that's way too snappy. How about: 11. FOR REASONS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FACT THAT

Re: plain language disclaimer

2000-12-15 Thread Bernhard R. Link
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Paul Kienzle wrote: BECAUSE THE PROGRAM IS LICENSED FREE OF CHARGE, Does the free license change the applicability of the law? And if it does, doesn't the fact that the license was provided for free immediately apply even if you don't mention that it