Re: sharpmusique in Debian

2006-05-23 Thread Charles Fry
Is there any legal reason why sharpmusique is not in Debian, given that multiple .deb packages already exist? If you're going to ask about a license (which is what I assume you are doing), please include the license in question (unless it is in /usr/share/common-licenses). In this case,

Re: sharpmusique in Debian

2006-05-23 Thread Frank Küster
Charles Fry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: /usr/share/common-licenses). In this case, the license in question is the GNU General Public License, version 2. I see no legal reason why this is not in Debian. I do see a technical reason: no one wants to make packages, apparently, since the RFP in

sharpmusique in Debian

2006-05-22 Thread Charles Fry
Hi, Is there any legal reason why sharpmusique is not in Debian, given that multiple .deb packages already exist? Charles -- Our fortune Is your Shaven face It's our best Advertising space Burma-Shave http://burma-shave.org/jingles/1953/our_fortune signature.asc Description: Digital