Hi all,
Is the license pasted below OK? It is OSI-approved, but someone on
debian-devel mentioned there were many problematic bits, including
2.2(c), and advised me to post it here.
I hope to package openwatcom, a C/C++ IDE that produces efficient DOS,
Linux, and Windows code and includes a
Truecrypt 4.2a has just been released, with a revised license:
http://www.truecrypt.org/license.php. Can someone please take a look at
it and see if it looks more like a free license? Thanks, Andrew.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Truecrypt 4.2a has just been released, with a revised license:
http://www.truecrypt.org/license.php. Can someone please take a look at
it and see if it looks more like a free license? Thanks, Andrew.
My criticisms seem to be addressed adequately. Others might have
On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 07:14:22 + (UTC) Jason Spiro wrote:
Hi all,
Is the license pasted below OK?
[...]
Sybase Open Watcom Public License version 1.0
[...]
Whoever finds the time to thoroughly analyse this license, please
consider to review the following thread, before:
On Sun, 02 Jul 2006 10:49:58 +0100 MJ Ray wrote:
Joe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIUI, the logos are considered trademarks. The licence strongly
implies that Debian does not claim copyright on
the open use logo, but merely trademark rights. [...]
I disagree. Copyright (c) 1999 Software in
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIUI, the logos are considered trademarks. The licence strongly implies
that Debian does not claim copyright on
the open use logo, but merely trademark rights. [...]
I disagree. Copyright (c) 1999
Jason Spiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is the license pasted below OK?
I don't think so. It seems to contradict itself - resulting in a
possible termination clause. It also requires long-term distribution,
discriminates against some commercial activities and attempts to enforce
patents unrelated to
Joe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
True. It would be better to drop the copyright, and use only
trademark rights, as that looks to be more or less the desired
effect.
What do you mean by drop the copyright? Without the notice, the work
is still the copyright of the holder; the notice just
8 matches
Mail list logo
