Re: Open Font License 1.1review2 - comments?

2006-12-13 Thread MJ Ray
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Forbidding reuse of a the name of the original software is OK, forbidding an arbitrary name is not. Don't you agree with me that this goes beyond what is allowed (again, as a compromise!) by DFSG#4 ? Please don't ask questions in the negative. I agree

Re: GFDL v2 draft 1 analysis [long]

2006-12-13 Thread MJ Ray
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Allows non-free derivs ? That's probably accurate too, yes. -- MJR/slef -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GFDL v2 draft 1 analysis [long]

2006-12-13 Thread Francesco Poli
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:22:22 + (GMT) MJ Ray wrote: Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Allows non-free derivs ? That's probably accurate too, yes. OK, I'm going to use that tagline for my comments (as soon as I submit them to the FSF). -- But it is also tradition that times

Re: Open Font License 1.1review2 - comments?

2006-12-13 Thread Francesco Poli
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:21:21 + (GMT) MJ Ray wrote: Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Forbidding reuse of a the name of the original software is OK, forbidding an arbitrary name is not. Don't you agree with me that this goes beyond what is allowed (again, as a compromise!) by

Re: GFDL v2 draft 1 analysis [long]

2006-12-13 Thread Ben Finney
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:22:22 + (GMT) MJ Ray wrote: Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Allows non-free derivs ? That's probably accurate too, yes. OK, I'm going to use that tagline for my comments (as soon as I submit them to the