On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:15:35 -0400 Arc Riley wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
It says that I must offer an opportunity to receive the Corresponding
Source of [my] version by providing access to the Corresponding Source
from a network server
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 01:42:15 +0300 Sami Liedes wrote:
Package: gpsdrive
Version: 2.10~pre4-6
Severity: normal
I would say this is serious...
[Cc: to debian-legal]
I am replying to the bug number and to the bug submitter,
while Cc:ing debian-legal.
Hi,
The source package contains
Francesco Poli wrote:
Arc Riley wrote:
If you setup a system which required a delay, that would be questionable.
I am not talking about an intentional delay.
I am talking about something like the following scenario:
the source-hosting server goes down, while I am on vacation on another
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:30:03 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Francesco Poli wrote:
Arc Riley wrote:
If you setup a system which required a delay, that would be questionable.
I am not talking about an intentional delay.
I am talking about something like the following scenario:
the
Francesco Poli wrote:
davi.leals wrote:
Francesco Poli wrote:
Arc Riley wrote:
If you setup a system which required a delay, that would be
questionable.
I am not talking about an intentional delay.
I am talking about something like the following scenario:
the
2008/8/30 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just host the source code at Savannah or any other similar service.
How does that scale when a lot of users modify or customize the code?
And, how can one do that and at the same time keep being anonymous
(dissident test)?
Greetings,
Miry
PS: I agree with
Francesco Poli wrote:
davi.leals@ wrote:
Francesco Poli wrote:
The problem is: while Savannah is down, am I failing to comply with the
license?
Everybody understand there is no perfect system. Even planes fails some
times!
Anyway, as Arc Riley exposed, if you fear, just host the
Miriam Ruiz wrote:
davi.leals wrote:
Just host the source code at Savannah or any other similar service.
How does that scale when a lot of users modify or customize the code?
Do you know about branches?
Anyway nobody force users to create a new branch. They can just create a new
repository
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:29:57 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
The problem is: while Savannah is down, am I failing to comply with the
license?
Everybody understand there is no perfect system. Even planes fails some times!
Anyway, as Arc Riley exposed, if you
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Damyan Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: rt2860-source
Version : 1.7.0.0
Upstream Author : Ralink Tech Inc
* URL : http://www.ralinktech.com/
* License : GPL-2+ some binary non-free firmware
Programming Lang: C
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Miriam Ruiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/30 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just host the source code at Savannah or any other similar service.
How does that scale when a lot of users modify or customize the code?
These are technical challenges, not legal
Hi,
On Aug 30 01:42, Sami Liedes wrote:
[Cc: to debian-legal]
The source package contains the file scripts/gpsfetchmap.pl, which
has this copyright notice:
#!/usr/bin/perl
# gpsfetchmap
#
# You are allowed to modify the
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 7:09 AM, Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:15:35 -0400 Arc Riley wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
It says that I must offer an opportunity to receive the Corresponding
Source of [my] version
[Note that I'm not subscribed to either d-d or d-legal so if you want
to ask me something, the quickest way is to Cc: me]
Hi,
I grepped the source tarballs in Lenny (testing) main section for the
note DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE - it is generated by Glade. which
indicates the file is generated using
Francesco Poli wrote:
Am I failing to comply with the license?
The only person who could say for sure would be a judge.
But, in general, it's worth noting that the law is not as robotic as
this. We could imagine all kinds of scenarios that could be construed
as violations of all kinds of
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Sami Liedes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I grepped the source tarballs in Lenny (testing) main section for the
note DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE - it is generated by Glade. which
indicates the file is generated using the Glade UI editor. Then I
checked if these packages
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Bryan Donlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 7:09 AM, Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:15:35 -0400 Arc Riley wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Am I failing to comply
This thread has slipped into absurdity.
These fringe cases with the viewpoint that free software copyright holders
are just biting at the bit to take people to court retroactively for
short-term lack of compliance at no fault of the software modifier.
The GPL could be abused by a copyright
18 matches
Mail list logo
