Hi dear MeeGo-dev,
(some CCs added for convenience and openness)
I am Didier 'OdyX' Raboud, a Debian Maintainer and I am part of the pkg-meego
group on Debian. Our (blurry) intent is to allow Debian users to benefit from
the software that comes out of the MeeGo project.
Following the Smeegol
// To the extent possible under law, X x...@xxx
// has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this work.
Is this wording valid to be considered as Public Domain?
Thanks
--
José Carlos García Sogo
js...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo jcs...@gmail.com writes:
Is this wording valid to be considered as Public Domain?
It's rather difficult to effectively place a work in the public domain.
Copyright laws nowadays are extremely sticky in their applicability, and
it's hard to avoid that.
Try the Creative
Hi!
I'm currently thinking of packaging a piece of software [1, 2] that is
itself licensed under the GPL but contains some data files which come
with a for non-commercial use only license [3]. I *think* it should
be okay to distribute these files in non-free but before I start
spending time here
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Stefan Ott ste...@ott.net wrote:
[3] http://www.eveonline.com/community/fs_agreement.asp
For reference, here is the full text of this agreement:
AGREEMENT FOR NON-COMMERCIAL USE
For Fan and News Sites, Online Radio Stations and Chat Venues
Please read this
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Stefan Ott ste...@ott.net wrote:
[3] http://www.eveonline.com/community/fs_agreement.asp
For reference, here is the full text of this agreement:
AGREEMENT FOR NON-COMMERCIAL USE
...
Upon
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 04:48, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Stefan Ott ste...@ott.net wrote:
[3] http://www.eveonline.com/community/fs_agreement.asp
For reference, here is the full text of
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Stefan Ott ste...@ott.net wrote:
Thanks for having a look at it. What about removing non-dfsg stuff
from upstream and fetching the data in postinst?
Sounds acceptable for contrib. What is this data anyway?
Oh noes, not *another* game! I barely manage to play
Stefan Ott ste...@ott.net writes:
Thanks for having a look at it. What about removing non-dfsg stuff
from upstream and fetching the data in postinst?
That would remove the package, at the least, to the ‘contrib’ area;
possibly further.
--
\ “I don't want to live peacefully with
9 matches
Mail list logo
