Retract: dissident test has been proven wrong and should not be used any more

Hi, On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:04:22PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: Agh ... who added this ... test should be done only to DFSG. The proposed dissident test does not work and is proven to be wrong in some cases already. Let me make this simple. I retract this general statement. What I had

Analysis of the Academic Free License (AFL) v3.0

Hello everybody, while reviewing subversion/1.7.5-1 debian/copyright file [1], I noticed that debian/contrib/svn_load_dirs is licensed under the AFL v3.0 . [1] http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/s/subversion/subversion_1.7.5-1/copyright I re-read the archived discussion [2] about

Re: Analysis of the Academic Free License (AFL) v3.0

On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 17:12:08 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: [...] My personal comments will follow shortly. My own personal analysis of this license is included below. Academic Free License (AFL) v. 3.0 [...] 3) Grant of Source Code License. The term Source Code means the preferred form

Re: Bug#681654: About kstars-data-extra-tycho2 distributability

tags 681654 - fixed-upstream thanks On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 07:33:38PM +0100, Noel David Torres Taño wrote: date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:52:43 +0200 from: HOTLINE-DU-CDS Non-Nominatif (UDS) cds-quest...@unistra.fr to: Noel David Torres Taño env...@rolamasao.org, HOTLINE-DU-CDS Non-Nominatif