On 13334 March 1977, Johannes Schauer wrote:
While this software violates dfsg without doubt, I wonder if it could be
distributed in non-free because it states that it can only be copied for
academic use. Is copying equal to distribution?
Not it can't, as it forbids redistribution. Which is
Hi,
Quoting Joerg Jaspert (2013-09-15 22:00:41)
Here it states distribution directly but also adds the educational,
research and non-profit purpose. This would meet the requirements for
inclusion in non-free, no?
Yes it does. It's the users task to check non-free licenses before they
do
2 matches
Mail list logo
