I want to package Cling, an interactive C++ interpreter built on the top of
LLVM and Clang libraries, developed and used at CERN.
This is a link to the License file of Cling:
https://github.com/root-mirror/root/blob/master/interpreter/cling/LICENSE.TXT
Due to my lack of knowledge in this, I
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Anirudha Bose wrote:
This is a link to the License file of Cling:
https://github.com/root-mirror/root/blob/master/interpreter/cling/LICENSE.TXT
For the record, here is the license text:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
For the record, here is the license text:
To me this looks like a BSD-3-clause and LGPL-2.1 dual license. The
project is therefore probably DFSG-free.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Anirudha Bose ani07...@gmail.com writes:
Due to my lack of knowledge in this, I would like to know if Cling is
fully compliant with the Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG) so
that I can proceed ahead with packaging it for the Debian archive.
Thank you for working to improve Debian, and for
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 08:02:49PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Anirudha Bose ani07...@gmail.com writes:
[...]
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
For the record, here is the license text:
==
Cling Release License
On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 20:02:49 +1100 Ben Finney wrote:
[...]
I would recommend the copyright holder should:
[...]
* Correct the LGPL text to match the GNU LGPL 2.1 exactly, as the
license on that text requires.
I would add that, if the grant is really a dual-licensing scheme (that
is to
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 2:21 AM, Francesco Poli wrote:
After all, the 3-clause BSD license is way more permissive than the
LGPL and does not include any restriction not present in the LGPL.
As a consequence, I would say that offering the LGPL as a second choice
is totally moot, once you have
7 matches
Mail list logo
