Hi Ian,
Thanks for the reply.
I see that there is no answer for Q4 in your forwarded mail, was that
originally not answered or just lost somewhere when forwarding?
My understanding on the first look is that the PHP license is flawed (tries
to limit the usage of php in naming but that is a futile
Riley Baird writes:
>> When writing the file, a line caught my attention, because it mentions
>> that the license is "personal" and "non-exclusive":
>>
>> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-osg/pkg-osg.git/tree/debian/copyright?h=debian-osg-3.2=0e3adbf30d2b1b02710513ac22c9711f5e9d8cad#n417
>
>
Ferenc Kovacs writes ("Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl
extensions"):
> I was just wondering if you were contacted or that you still plan to
> publish the legal advice received back then?
Thanks for the reminder. I knew I wouldn't need to make a note in my
diary :-).
3 matches
Mail list logo
