Re: Patents and revocation clauses

1999-03-19 Thread Paul Nathan Puri
That is the correct legal conclusion... so there ;) NatePuri Certified Law Student Debian GNU/Linux Monk McGeorge School of Law [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ompages.com On Thu, 18 Mar 1999, Jules Bean wrote: On Thu, 18 Mar 1999, Bruce Sass wrote: On 16 Mar 1999, Henning Makholm wrote:

Re: APSL Hidden Nasty's

1999-03-19 Thread John Hasler
Jules Bean writes: But you think that minors cannot work on GPL programs? I said *if* a minor cannot agree to the GPL. I'm not entirely certain he can't. It is my understanding that the theory behind the unenforceability of contracts with minors is that they are considered to be unable to

Re: APSL Hidden Nasty's

1999-03-19 Thread Ben Pfaff
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A more serious question is whether a minor can license his own work without his guardian's consent. I don't think he can. I think that a court would rule that in doing so he is giving up valuable rights and that he is not competent to make the

Re: APSL Hidden Nasty's

1999-03-19 Thread Jules Bean
On 18 Mar 1999, John Hasler wrote: Jules Bean writes: But you think that minors cannot work on GPL programs? I said *if* a minor cannot agree to the GPL. I'm not entirely certain he can't. It is my understanding that the theory behind the unenforceability of contracts with minors is

Re: APSL Hidden Nasty's

1999-03-19 Thread Ian Jackson
Jules Bean writes (Re: APSL Hidden Nasty's): ... There is a license. I quote from the book in my hands Copyright (c) 1997,1996 O'Reilly and Associates, Inc. All rights reserved. Thats a license. The most restrictive around. No, it's a copyright notice. It's precisely NOT any kind of

Re: APSL Hidden Nasty's

1999-03-19 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Jackson writes (Re: APSL Hidden Nasty's): ... Copyright law makes it a civil offence to do certain things to a copyrighted work without permission (called a licence) from the copyright holder. Children can in most jurisdictions be held responsible for civil offences they commit. I should

Re: APSL Hidden Nasty's

1999-03-19 Thread Henning Makholm
Ben Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A more serious question is whether a minor can license his own work without his guardian's consent. I don't think he can. Boy, I hope that doesn't invalidate all the code (and copyright assignments) I wrote for FSF

Re: APSL Hidden Nasty's

1999-03-19 Thread Jonathan P Tomer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A more serious question is whether a minor can license his own work without his guardian's consent. I don't think he can. I think that a court would rule that in doing so he is giving up valuable rights and that he is not competent

Re: APSL Hidden Nasty's

1999-03-19 Thread John Hasler
Ben Pfaff writes: Boy, I hope that doesn't invalidate all the code (and copyright assignments) I wrote for FSF and Debian before I turned 18 :-) Did you get your mother to sign for you :-) -- John HaslerThis posting is in the public domain. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do

Re: APSL Hidden Nasty's

1999-03-19 Thread John Hasler
Jules writes: I checked with my local friendly software lawyer. He said that minors can enter into copyright licenses - the key point being that a copyright license *gives* a right which the minor didn't have before (so he can't complain it's restricting him). My thinking exactly. I'm

Need GPL exception statement for Qt-using code

1999-03-19 Thread J.H.M. Dassen
I've talked to the author of a Qt-using GPL-ed program about resolving the license issue with his code; he's quite responsive. What I need is a nicely phrased despite what the GPL requires, it's OK to link this code against Qt and redistribute the resulting binaries statement - can someone here

Re: Need GPL exception statement for Qt-using code

1999-03-19 Thread Ben Pfaff
J.H.M. Dassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What I need is a nicely phrased despite what the GPL requires, it's OK to link this code against Qt and redistribute the resulting binaries statement - can someone here provide one? I would put the following license on each file in the program.

Re: Need GPL exception statement for Qt-using code

1999-03-19 Thread Brian Ristuccia
On Fri, Mar 19, 1999 at 09:33:44PM +0100, J.H.M. Dassen wrote: I've talked to the author of a Qt-using GPL-ed program about resolving the license issue with his code; he's quite responsive. What I need is a nicely phrased despite what the GPL requires, it's OK to link this code against Qt

Re: Need GPL exception statement for Qt-using code

1999-03-19 Thread Brian Ristuccia
On Fri, Mar 19, 1999 at 03:50:02PM -0500, Ben Pfaff wrote: J.H.M. Dassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What I need is a nicely phrased despite what the GPL requires, it's OK to link this code against Qt and redistribute the resulting binaries statement - can someone here provide one?

Re: What exactly is Derivative ?

1999-03-19 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 11:10:18PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote: The derivate-question itself has much more interesting examples. For example for which of the following examples is A a derivative of B? 1) program A, statically linked with a library B 2) program A, dynamically linker with