On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 08:04:15PM +0100, Christian Surchi wrote:
fetchmail is licensed under GPL license. What about conflict between GPL
and BSD clauses from openssl? I mean the problem with mutt and ssl. What
about lynx-ssl, links-ssl, fetchmail-ssl and others?
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Raul Miller wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 08:04:15PM +0100, Christian Surchi wrote:
fetchmail is licensed under GPL license. What about conflict between GPL
and BSD clauses from openssl? I mean the problem with mutt and ssl. What
about lynx-ssl, links-ssl,
Hi all,
Has anyone written a plain language disclaimer? It bothers me to see such
redundant language on licenses, especially when they must appear in every
file. I have a package ready to be distributed with Debian as soon as I
sort out the license.
Is legalese really a legal necessity, or is
Paul Kienzle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is clearly redundant and awkward, so how about:
This program is provided as is without warranty of any
kind. Use it at your own risk.
Nah, that's way too snappy. How about:
11. FOR REASONS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FACT THAT
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Paul Kienzle wrote:
BECAUSE THE PROGRAM IS LICENSED FREE OF CHARGE,
Does the free license change the applicability of the law?
And if it does, doesn't the fact that the license was provided
for free immediately apply even if you don't mention that it
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 04:31:09AM -0700, John Galt wrote:
I hear the wheel was also not released under the GPL
I hear that the wheel is not considered intellectual property.
--
Raul
Okay, I'll spell it out. Rewriting BSDL'd stuff with the GPL is one of
the things that really gets in the BSD community's craw. Basically they
take it as an embrace and extend move by the FSF. It's rather ironic
coming from me, but can't we all just forget the BSD/GPL bullshit for once
and
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 11:36:34AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 04:31:09AM -0700, John Galt wrote:
I hear the wheel was also not released under the GPL
I hear that the wheel is not considered intellectual property.
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 04:06:06PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
Okay, I'll spell it out. Rewriting BSDL'd stuff with the GPL is one of
the things that really gets in the BSD community's craw. Basically they
take it as an embrace and extend move by the FSF. It's rather ironic
coming from
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 01:21:56PM +1300, Carey Evans wrote:
I believe openssl inherits most of its GPL-incompatible clauses from
ssleay. For example, I have an old copy of fcrypt.c, which is part of
Eric Young's libdes, which includes:
* 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or
begin John Galt quotation:
I know that serious consideration of anything over one line (hence
your prediliction for the one-line dismissal of anyone who you have
had disagreements with in the past) is beyond your skills, but
please don't remind me of it
Perhaps your time would be
11 matches
Mail list logo
