Finjan NG5000 Web Proxy

2005-11-09 Thread Alan Dawson
Hi, A company I work for is evaluating the http://www.finjan.com/products/EnterpriseProducts/NG5000/ Web proxy device. When it boots it outputs to a monitor ( amongst other things ) Uncompressing Linux .. INIT: Entering Run Level 2 .. Starting system log daemon: syslogd Starting kernel log

Re: Finjan NG5000 Web Proxy

2005-11-09 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 09 novembre 2005 à 10:23 +, Alan Dawson a écrit : Hi, A company I work for is evaluating the http://www.finjan.com/products/EnterpriseProducts/NG5000/ Web proxy device. When it boots it outputs to a monitor ( amongst other things ) Debian Gnu/Linux 3.1 Vital Security

Re: Finjan NG5000 Web Proxy

2005-11-09 Thread Alan Dawson
Quoting Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I can't find any mention of Debian in the documentation or their website There's no need for them to mention Debian. However, the source should be provided alongside with the device. If it isn't, and if there isn't a written offer to get this

Re: Finjan NG5000 Web Proxy

2005-11-09 Thread Andrew Donnellan
I've emailed finjan software asking for them to put the sourcecode up. andrew On 11/10/05, Alan Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I can't find any mention of Debian in the documentation or their website There's no need for them to mention

Re: Finjan NG5000 Web Proxy

2005-11-09 Thread Arnoud Engelfriet
Hi, Andrew Donnellan wrote: I've emailed finjan software asking for them to put the sourcecode up. I'd be interested in seeing what (if anything) they respond. Based on what I read at the website, this product likely includes iptables and netfilter. You may want to inform Harald Welte, its

Re: Finjan NG5000 Web Proxy

2005-11-09 Thread Andrew Donnellan
I'll put any response on-list. Also, yes, I have seen GPL Violations. I will contact them if finjan doesn't respond. Andrew On 11/10/05, Arnoud Engelfriet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Andrew Donnellan wrote: I've emailed finjan software asking for them to put the sourcecode up. I'd be

Re: Ubuntu CDs contain no sources

2005-11-09 Thread Christofer C. Bell
On 11/8/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I have asked some CDs from Ubuntu and they have sent me their Debian-based distro for free (as in free beer). However, they contain GPL-licensed software, including dpkg, but not their sources. Ubuntu does distribute sources; and

Is the Smithsonian Institution Copyright License DFSG-Free?

2005-11-09 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello good people-- I'm considering ITP'ing CIAO [0], but before i look into it further, i wanted to get this community's advice on its freeness. I wasn't able to find any prior discussion of CIAO within debian, but if i missed something, please let

Re: Is the Smithsonian Institution Copyright License DFSG-Free?

2005-11-09 Thread Francesco Poli
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:54:58 -0500 Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: [...] Hello good people-- Hi! :) I'm considering ITP'ing CIAO [0], but before i look into it further, i wanted to get this community's advice on its freeness. Good. [...] The only other debian reference to this license i've

Re: Licenses for DebConf6 [was: Re: DebConf6: Call For Papers]

2005-11-09 Thread Francesco Poli
[replying to a message that was directed to debian-devel only, but readding debian-legal in Cc:] On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:38:07 +0100 Andreas Schuldei wrote: * Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-08 00:28:07]: The authors have the freedom to pick a DFSG-free license means that they *may*

Re: KJV Bible - Crown Copyright in UK and Commonwealth

2005-11-09 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 05:43:33PM +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote: Does the crown copyright on the KJV affect other Commonwealth countries e.g. Australia? I don't know. If it hasn't been abrogated by the Australian legislative body between independence and present, it does. I suppose that

Re: KJV Bible - Crown Copyright in UK and Commonwealth

2005-11-09 Thread Andrew Donnellan
I believe section 5 is basically repealing the Imperial Copyright Act 1911. I think section 8a(2) is saying that you can do anything you want with Crown works and still not infringe, on the condition that there are no other copyright holders, e.g. I can copy the KJV, but not government works