Re: music123

2010-03-05 Thread xavier grave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Jean-Pierre Rosen a écrit :
 I don't know if it is an issue, but I noted that music123 might be a
 (TM), see http://www.music123.com/

Thanks Jean-Pierre for the information.

In CANADIAN TRADE-MARK DATABASE music123.com is registered.
In the US MUSIC123 and MUSIC123.COM are registered.
I'm not a lawyer but it seems that our music123 doesn't enter in the
Goods and Services description [1]. Is this enough ?

I CC the debian-legal list for help/advices.

xavier

[1] http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=docstate=4002:h7f25.2.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkuRBvAACgkQVIZi0A5BZF5FOQCgxLTRh/Q3dU7acwS0Un9GBmEf
jUgAoKTtxHcFxdL/zYd7CTNFeNNlTdtK
=C/Zc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b9106f0.6080...@ipno.in2p3.fr



Re: Re: opencascade license in squeeze

2010-03-05 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hi Francesco,

I contacted upstream a number of times a couple of years ago, and never
got any reply.

That said, a couple of people convinced me that OCTPL is (now)
GPL-compatible, so FreeCAD is distributable, based on the following
points:
  * The clause indicating You are also obliged to send your
modifications of the original source code (if you've made any)
to the Initial Developer, which was in OCTPL 6.2, is gone from
OCTPL 6.3.0.  The license on opencascade.org is wrong, see the
LICENSE file in the distribution, where the introductory
language containing the above clause has been removed.
  * The statement that the copyright license is not a trademark
license is not in conflict with the GPL, and explicitly stated
as an option in GPL-3.  I don't think anyone believes GPL-3 is
incompatible with GPL-2...
  * There are other copyleft licenses which are GPL-compatible but
do not include explicit GPL-compatibility clauses.  (And there
are probably copyleft licenses which claim to be GPL-compatible
in their clauses but aren't.)  The basic requirement is that the
license not add additional restrictions beyond the GPL.

LGPL licensing of OpenCASCADE would clear this up once and for all.  But
on the other hand, as one debian-legal poster mentioned (sorry, can't
find the reference just now), the trademark clause clarifies the (lack
of) trademark rights on derivatives more than other licenses (such as
Firefox, which has a separate trademark policy).  Whether that makes it
a good license worth using is debatable, but it's doubtful upstream
will walk away from it.

That said, I'm going to contact a couple of people and see if there is a
potential for LGPL licensing...

Sorry these points have not been aired in a public forum before.  I'm
not subscribed to debian-legal, and only recently became aware of these
posts (thanks Francesco!), so I didn't know that people were raising an
issue of this.

[As a result of not being subscribed, please CC me in replies.]

-Adam
-- 
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Re: opencascade license in squeeze

2010-03-05 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:09:45PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
   * The statement that the copyright license is not a trademark
 license is not in conflict with the GPL, and explicitly stated
 as an option in GPL-3.  I don't think anyone believes GPL-3 is
 incompatible with GPL-2...

Dear Adam,

I have not followed the issue so I can not help you to solve it, however
I just would like to correct one thing that you wrote above: the GPLs
version 2 and 3 are incompatible. You can find more detailed explanations
on the FSF website:

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#v2v3Compatibility

Have a nice week-end,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100306015340.gc12...@kunpuu.plessy.org