Re: GPL3 compatible?

2010-03-21 Thread Ludovico Cavedon
Hi Charles, Charles Plessy wrote: it looks like you are discussing the file rtengine/cubic.cc in RawTherapee: http://code.google.com/p/rawtherapee/source/browse/trunk/rtengine/cubic.cc correct I will answer to your last question first. If the RawTherapee authors obtained the agreement of

Re: Vagueness of what is ‘substantial’ in the Expat license.

2010-03-21 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:03:12 +1100 Ben Finney wrote: Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes: I would like to make a small comment about the “Expat” license, that personally I would not recommend when proposing a relicensing, because of the following sentence: ‘The above copyright

debhelper and GPL

2010-03-21 Thread Jean-Christophe Dubacq
Hello, While conducting routine reading, I saw that debhelper is released under the GPL license. Since debhelper includes bits of itself in the package it manages, does this mean that I cannot use debhelper for packaging something that would be GPL-incompatible? I know that for fonts, one has to

Re: debhelper and GPL

2010-03-21 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:56:31 +0100, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote: Hello, While conducting routine reading, I saw that debhelper is released under the GPL license. Since debhelper includes bits of itself in the package it manages, does this mean that I cannot use debhelper for packaging

Re: debhelper and GPL

2010-03-21 Thread Ben Finney
Jean-Christophe Dubacq jcduba...@free.fr writes: While conducting routine reading, I saw that debhelper is released under the GPL license. Since debhelper includes bits of itself in the package it manages, does this mean that I cannot use debhelper for packaging something that would be