Re: Open Database License (ODbL)

2010-08-11 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 11:30:35 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: [...] ## ODC Open Database License (ODbL) Better late than never, what follows is my own personal analysis of the license. My first comment is about the very existence of this license: we should fight license proliferation as much as we

SWIG license change to GPLv3, wording of debian/copyright?

2010-08-11 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi *, I am still working on getting a SWIG 2.0 package out of the door. The least interesting part (for me) is the licensing change. SWIG changed from a mix of BSD/MIT licenses to GPLv3 with version 2.0. I wonder about the wording of debian/copyright. I don't really want to reproduce the full

Re: SWIG license change to GPLv3, wording of debian/copyright?

2010-08-11 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:26:43PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff a écrit : http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-swig/branches/swig2.0/LICENSE-UNIVERSITIES Instead I would rather refer to common-licenses, but the texts of the license in there do not match word-by-word with BSD/MIT. Does anybody