On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:27:11 -0400 Felyza Wishbringer wrote:
[...]
My proposed WTFPLv3 (2011)
http://gamingtools.com/WTFPLv3.txt
Which changed name of the license and copyright. and add 2
termsconditions statements
Updated from earlier today... a change to TC 1, which now states: You
have
My reading and understanding is that they are basically the same.
From the GPLv2, it states that the copyright holder (author) and
anyone who modifies or redistributes the code cannot be held liable to
you for damages.
From the proposed WTFPLv3, it states You are solely liable for 'what
you do
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:17:13 -0400 Felyza Wishbringer wrote:
My reading and understanding is that they are basically the same.
I am not convinced...
From the GPLv2, it states that the copyright holder (author) and
anyone who modifies or redistributes the code cannot be held liable to
you
Would this be better wording?
2. Nobody is liable for what .. you do with it
The WTFPL goes beyond disclaimer to place liability on the licensee.
That's an unusual step, and I'm not convinced that it preserves the
recipient's freedom.
--
-Felyza
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Le Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 07:02:53PM -0400, Felyza Wishbringer a écrit :
Would this be better wording?
2. Nobody is liable for what .. you do with it
Dear Felyza,
I think that unfortunately, there is no possiblity to have a license that is
short and fun / satyrical / provocative / …, and at
Felyza Wishbringer fel...@gmail.com writes:
Would this be better wording?
I don't have a lot of interest in constructing new license texts, since
I much prefer that all software distributors avoid unnecessary license
proliferation.
Please, instead of constructing new licenses, use an existing
6 matches
Mail list logo
