Re: libidn re-license

2012-03-09 Thread Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
Simon Josefsson si...@josefsson.org writes: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo k...@iki.fi writes: I believe GPLv2+|LGPLv3+ is incompatible with GPLv2|OpenSSL-linking-exception, used in ekg2. Thank you for a good data point. I've brought this up with licens...@gnu.org to hear what they have to say

Re: libidn re-license

2012-03-09 Thread Simon Josefsson
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo k...@iki.fi writes: Simon Josefsson si...@josefsson.org writes: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo k...@iki.fi writes: I believe GPLv2+|LGPLv3+ is incompatible with GPLv2|OpenSSL-linking-exception, used in ekg2. Thank you for a good data point. I've brought this up with

Re: MIT +no-false-attribs

2012-03-09 Thread Jérémy Lal
On 24/01/2012 15:24, MJ Ray wrote: Jérémy Lal je...@edagames.com following npm license is Expat + one restriction, is it still DFSG ? If it just this one addition: Distributions of all or part of the Software intended to be used by the recipients as they would use the unmodified Software,

Re: libidn re-license

2012-03-09 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Kalle Olavi Niemitalo k...@iki.fi [120309 13:11]: On second thought, if a program is licensed under GPLv2 with an additional permission to link with OpenSSL, this permission does not survive linking with LGPLv2 libraries either, such as glibc or libidn before your relicensing. (The reason

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] MIT +no-false-attribs

2012-03-09 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 12-03-09 at 04:34pm, Jérémy Lal wrote: * it is really easy to comply with this license. * the bug-reporting contacts can be changed easily * they don't need to be changed anyway, the npm debian package won't need any patch (i mean the one being prepared, version 1.1.x, not the one in sid,

Re: MIT +no-false-attribs

2012-03-09 Thread Ben Finney
Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org writes: On 06/03/2012 19:20, Isaac Schlueter wrote: In other words, if the terms of this license keep npm out of Debian Stable, or any particular distro, then that means it's working. The fact that npm is not in the distro is worse for the distro than it is

Re: MIT +no-false-attribs

2012-03-09 Thread Jérémy Lal
On 09/03/2012 23:14, Ben Finney wrote: Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org writes: On 06/03/2012 19:20, Isaac Schlueter wrote: In other words, if the terms of this license keep npm out of Debian Stable, or any particular distro, then that means it's working. The fact that npm is not in the distro

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] MIT +no-false-attribs

2012-03-09 Thread Jose Luis Rivas
On 03/09/2012 05:44 PM, Ben Finney wrote: Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org writes: On 06/03/2012 19:20, Isaac Schlueter wrote: In other words, if the terms of this license keep npm out of Debian Stable, or any particular distro, then that means it's working. The fact that npm is not in the