Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] MIT +no-false-attribs

2012-03-10 Thread Jérémy Lal
On 10/03/2012 01:23, Ben Finney wrote: Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org writes: On 09/03/2012 23:14, Ben Finney wrote: On 06/03/2012 19:20, Isaac Schlueter wrote: In other words, if the terms of this license keep npm out of Debian Stable, or any particular distro, then that means it's

Copyright on a proposed Debian package

2012-03-10 Thread Sian Mountbatten
I attach a copy of the copyright file used in algol68toc. Please would you say whether the copyright is acceptable to Debian and, if not, what changes should be made to make the copyright acceptable. Sincerely -- Sian Mountbatten Algol 68 specialist This Program is the property of the

Re: Copyright on a proposed Debian package

2012-03-10 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Sian Mountbatten wrote: I attach a copy of the copyright file used in algol68toc. Please would you say whether the copyright is acceptable to Debian and, if not, what changes should be made to make the copyright acceptable. Clause c is a bit ambiguous and

Re: MIT +no-false-attribs

2012-03-10 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 04:34:10PM +0100, Jérémy Lal a écrit : In the latest version, Author has been replaced by Original Author, and that term defined in the copyright line : https://raw.github.com/isaacs/npm/master/LICENSE Dear Jérémy, this clause is quite similar to the clause 6c of the