On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 21:52:58 + Clint Adams wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:31:55PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
For reasons I won't elaborate on here (they would drive us far away
from the topic under discussion), I consider the GNU GPL v3 as a
license with a broken copyleft
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:00:08 +0200 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:31:55PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
There are two issues with your previous reply:
* it was not clear that your request for more info also included
questions about the particular copyright licenses
Le Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 06:34:52PM +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
In the meanwhile, what I was proposing was that the licensing of the
Debian Open Use Logo should not create a deliberate incompatibility
with either the GPLv2 or the GPLv3.
Hi Francesco,
The Debian Open Use Logo without «
3 matches
Mail list logo
